After reading
the articles that were assigned for class 9 there was one that stood out to me.
I chose this article partly because of my minimal knowledge of First Nations
people in Canada and how much I learned from this small piece; and partly
because I have been hearing a lot about their past in the news recently and
thought it would be interesting to take a deeper look at their history and on
how it may have affected their citizenship. The article that I chose is by
James Daschuk and is titled Clearing the Plains: Disease, the politics of
starvation and the loss of aboriginal life.
When looking at
this article, though it may not be clear at first, there are a couple of things
that stand out, especially about our concept of citizenship. The main argument
that I see contained in this conclusion of a book as described by Daschuk is
that based on ecological, economical and “political forces that shaped the
medical histories of First Nations people in Western Canada”, “it has outlined
the origin of health inequity between Indigenous and mainstream Canadians” and
showed that a “decline of First Nations health was the direct result of
economic and cultural suppression” in two distinct phases. The first being the
introduction of contagious diseases that hammered otherwise healthy
populations, and the second being the relationship between First Nations and
Canada.
Looking at the
first phase, the author describes these epidemics as a result of the extension
of the economic system into western Canada. Explaining that generally First
Nations in the west were shaped by disease. He shows us that based on all the
deaths that were occurring, the Assiniboine left the Red River valley and went
to the parklands in Manitoba and eastern Saskatchewan. He goes on to describe
that in the 1830’s they felt the full epidemic of smallpox because of their
location between English and American traders. Because of this, Daschuk says
there are only a handful of their reserves left. He also talks about the
decline of Arikara and Mandan near the Missouri River, again blaming disease
for spreading through their communities. Next he talks about the virgin soil
outbreak of smallpox in southern Alberta before 1750 but says it got there
before the Europeans. Its pointed out that equestrian travel is what may have
brought it over from eastern Canada.
Now looking at
phase two. The author describes a terrible relationship between the First
Nations and Canada. The treaties were essential for the government and were
seen as necessary for the development of the region, where as for the First
Nations they were seen as a bridge to a future with no bison. The treaty 6 not
only helped them gain agricultural support, but negotiated for medical aid and
relief. It turns out that getting rid of the bison “brought a fundamental
change in the power dynamic between First Nations and the Canadian state. With
loss of the bison, indigenous people lost their independence and power”. This
led to famine, and the first emergence of tuberculosis in the region. The
author goes on to describe that once the conservative government took over in
1878 famine became a huge issue. The government began to use food as a way to
control the First Nations population, allowing people to supply bad or
contaminated food in order to maximize their profits. Because this was the only
food source for the First Nations in the area it made many “vulnerable to the
predations of officials who abused their authority”.
As Daschuk explains, by the early twentieth
century based on what had happened with disease and the government, it was
looked at as acceptable to think that indigenous people were more likely to get
disease than the mainstream population. With this belief, it made Aboriginal
people marginalized from Canadian society. This shows that the “decline of
First Nations health was the direct result of economic and cultural
suppression”.
When looking at
the strengths of this article there a few that stand out. I thought that it was
good that the article did not only look at one time period or one tribe of
First Nations people. The article went through different times in history, and
looked at affects that were felt by different tribes. I also thought one of the
strengths was the language used in the text. It was easy to understand and made
reading it a lot more enjoyable than having to search for meaning. One small
weakness that stood out to me was that it only looked at the bad things Canada
has done to its First Nations people. I understand that’s part of the argument,
but I’m sure in all the history between Canada and its people there must be
something positive the country did.
This article is
very useful. It allows readers to see into the past; a past that they may not
have even known existed. It allows teachers and regular citizens alike to see that
First Nations have been struggling with citizenship for centuries, and that
they have been suppressed economically and culturally for just as long. By
teachers reading this article, it may allow them to get a better understanding
of what their First Nations students ancestors went through, and why they may
have a negative view of Canada.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Ryan,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing the thoughts. Your comments about the weakness of the article is a good one. Although I understand the author depicts "disease, the politics of starvation and the loss of aboriginal life", it would be fair if he addresses what those new arrivals brought to the first nation communities that might be positive. For example, do they bring new medicine, new hygiene standard, and new knowledge of the world etc.
Cheers,
Feifei
Hey there,
DeleteInteresting points! I have never thought about the "positive" sides of colonization, likely because we were taught for so long that 'we' brought 'progress' to North America, and when you realize that this isn't necessarily the case, it is easy to reject this premise in full, and only focus on the devastating impacts that this ideology had. I would be curious to hear from some Indigenous communities what they believe are more neutral or even 'positive' effects of colonization.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Ryan,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughtful posting.
Your comment about the author presenting only the bad things Canada has done to its Indigenous people resonates with me because it makes me feel that Canada is the most unfair country in the world. As an international student who came to Canada last year, I have heard many people talking about First Nations population. However, I was not too sure about who the aboriginal people are and how they live, because we do not have any indigenous population in Oman. Thus, I have become very curious to find out about the history of First Nations people. Reading Daschuk's (2013) chapter, I have gained considerable knowledge about the health of aboriginal people. I was shocked to see the health inequity between Indigenous and mainstream Canadians in western Canada, as well as how Canada used disease and starvation to "clear the plains". However, I asked a few doctors, who work for Ottawa hospital, about the health care provided to First Nations people and they told me that these people are escorted by a helicopter to the hospital for free. Moreover, I have been told that these people have access to all health services like any mainstream Canadian. Additionally, the Canadian government provides free accommodation for every indigenous patient who needs to stay in town for follow-up appointments. However, Daschuk (2013) does not only overemphasize the negative things that Canada has done to these Aboriginals but also totally ignore the positive things done.
Best regards,
Said Al-Badri